"Ko o čemu .....

VIP
Učlanjen(a)
14.07.2011
Poruka
19.107
Ja se ne bojim istine, jer da se bojim, ne bih je ni iznosio. Vi se bojite prave Istine, jer vam ruši sve.

Hajde onda da biblijom ispitamo svaku tačku vere Adventista, da vidimo da li je po bibliji.


Krist nije utemeljio "sjedište svoje Crkve", nego Crkvu.

Tačno, Hristos je utemeljio crkvu sa sedištem u Jerusalimu.

Justinijan je RKC ustanovio u Rimu, a ne prvu Hristovu crkvu.

Isusovi apostoli nisu "vlastodršci", da bi im Isus takvu vlast predao. Apostoli su služitelji Kristova evanđelja. I Krist je upravo Petru ostavio "prvenstvo služenja", a sveti Petar bijaše prvi biskup Rimske crkve.

Nigde to u istoriji i bibliji ne postoji.

To su izmislile pape da im vlast bude prijemčljivija za narod.

Da vidimo šta biblija uči:

"I ja, braćo, ne mogoh s vama govoriti kao s duhovnima nego kao s tjelesnima, kao s malom djecom u Hristu.
Mlijekom vas napojih a ne jelom, jer još ne mogaste, i ni sad još ne možete,
Jer ste još tjelesni. Jer gdje su među vama zavisti i svađe i nesloge, nijeste li tjelesni, i ne živite li po čovjeku?

Jer kad govori ko: ja sam Pavlov; a drugi: ja sam Apolov; nijeste li tjelesni?
Ko je dakle Pavle a ko li Apolo do samo sluge kroz koje vjerovaste, kao što i svakome Gospod dade?

Ja posadih, Apolo zali, a Bog dade te uzraste.
Tako niti je onaj što koji sadi, ni onaj koji zaljeva, nego Bog koji daje te raste.
A onaj koji sadi i koji zaljeva jednaki su; i svaki će primiti svoju platu po svojemu trudu"
( 1 Korinćanima 3. 1 - 8 )



Zato niko da se ne hvali čovjekom, jer je sve vaše.
Bio Pavle, ili Apolo, ili Kifa, ili svijet, ili život ili smrt, ili sadašnje, ili buduće: sve je vaše;
A vi ste Hristovi a Hristos Božij"
( 1 Korinćanima 3. 21 - 23 )

Dakle, biblija pobija ovakvo učenje koje iznosiš


Ostanimo u 3. stoljeću. Navedi nekoliko imena progonitelja iz Rimokatoličke crkve, i nekoliko imena progonjenih žrtava. Dakle, činjenicama potkrijepi ovu svoju tvrdnju.

Prva crkva je u početku bila progonjena od Jevreja, i tu i tamo od pojedinih Rimskih impšeratora.

Polovinom 2 veka je došlo do velikog otpada koji je bio izazvan kompromisom lokalne Rimske crkve sa svetovnom mnogobožačkom vlašću, zbog opšteg progonstva Jevreja zbog ustanka Simona Barkohbe polovinom 2 veka, koje je zahvatilo i Hrišćane.
Rimska crkva se distancirala od Jevreja odrekavši se svega što bi ih povezalo sa njima.

Konstantin je oko 300 godine prihvatio Hrišćanstvo kao državnu religiju Rimskog carstva, i omogućio mnogobošcima da pređu u novu veru.
Tako je mnoštvo mnogobožačkih učenja i verovanja uneseno u crkvu posredstvom mnogobožaca koji su postajali Hrišćani, a nisu napuštali svoja ranija verovanja, učenja, i običaje.

Opšte progonstvo je počelo kasnije, oko 538, kada je Justinijan isterao Arijanske ostrogote iz Rima i vlast predao Rimskom biskupu sa sve riznicom i vojskom.
Skoro sve pape su bili progonitelji, koristeći se svetovnim vlastima i inkvizicijom u kažnjavanju jeretika koji nisu priznavali papsku vlast i odricali se Hristovog jevanđelja.


Oborili smo vam sve biblijom pa se pravite ludi! Sta jos hocete? Vi samo idete i vicete "niste dokazali"!

Nije lepo lagati.

Vi biobliju ni ne koristite u diskusijama, i to svako sa strane može da vidi.

Upravo mi sve vreme dokazujemo biblijom, i SVE smo oborili biblijom, svaku tvrdnju, ili laž koju iznosite.

Vi ne znate ništa drugo osim da iznosite laži, da izvrćete tuđe reči, i da iskrivljujete biblijske tekstove vadeći ih iz konteksta.
 
Član
Učlanjen(a)
28.03.2013
Poruka
13.330
Nije lepo lagati.

Vi biobliju ni ne koristite u diskusijama, i to svako sa strane može da vidi.

Na svim temama moze da se vidi nase citiranje biblije i obaranje vase nauke. I ko je onda lazljivac? Bezocno lazete, sve sto kazete je cista laz. Tu pricu da mi ne koristimo bibliju pricaj nekom ko nije citao sve sto smo na forumu pisali od pocetka. Mi smo uvek citirali, a ti si sa druge strane izjavio da '' Boga ne mozemo zakljucati u bibliju" i to pricas onda kada ti se ucenje ne slaze sa njom. Ti nisi ni "sola scriptura Hriscanin" a opet nas optuzujes da je ne koristimo i tvrdis da citiramo neke crkvene Oce koje ni pomenuli nismo, a svi smo njom dokazivali dok vi citirate EGW, sva nauka vam se na njoj bazira a ne na bibliji. Plus vasa licna lupetanja i izigravanja proroka, davanje prorocanstava od kojih vam se nijedno nije ispunilo i ti licno si davao i ispao laza!

Znaci bezocno lazete i pretvarate se ovde sirom celog foruma kako ste vi "biblijski hriscani" a mi smo "otpadnici od nje" i ponavljate neprestano isto kao papagaji da nas omalovazite!

No, nista ti ovo ne vredi ljudi vide ko je izvojevao pobedu, ko je Hriscanin a ko je laza! U lazi su kratke noge, a vi ste se osramotili kao niko do sada!

I zasto bismo mi ponovo davali bibliju kada vas ona ne interesuje? Ne treba prosipati bisere pred svinje. Kao svinje se i ponasate, jer sve izgazite nogama i hocete jos i da nas rastrgnete! Zelite da nam "Bog rusi hramove" da nas "utopi u poplavi" da se "mi pred vama ponizavamo" i slicno. To ste sve izjavljivali i da je nasa crkva kurva koju treba pobediti. To je vasa jedina misija i jedina zelja - naruziti i unistiti Hristovu crkvu a nas licno omalovaziti pricama kako mi ne postujemo bibliju, kako smo "ovakvi i onakvi.." , zato ste se i urotili protiv nas i kujete zavere kako da nas uklonite sa foruma!

Svi vide vasa dela, ona svedoce i pokazuju kakav vam je duh, kakvi su vam rodovi i kakvi ste kao ljudi!
 
Poslednja izmena:
Učlanjen(a)
11.02.2009
Poruka
8.070
Na svim temama moze da se vidi nase citiranje biblije i obaranje vase nauke. I ko je onda lazljivac? Bezocno lazete, sve sto kazete je cista laz. Tu pricu da mi ne koristimo bibliju pricaj nekom ko nije citao sve sto smo na forumu pisali od pocetka. Mi smo uvek citirali, a ti si sa druge strane izjavio da '' Boga ne mozemo zakljucati u bibliju" i to pricas onda kada ti se ucenje ne slaze sa njom. Ti nisi ni "sola scriptura Hriscanin" a opet nas optuzujes da je ne koristimo i tvrdis da citiramo neke crkvene Oce koje ni pomenuli nismo, a svi smo njom dokazivali dok vi citirate EGW, sva nauka vam se na njoj bazira a ne na bibliji. Plus vasa licna lupetanja i izigravanja proroka, davanje prorocanstava od kojih vam se nijedno nije ispunilo i ti licno si davao i ispao laza!

Znaci bezocno lazete i pretvarate se ovde sirom celog foruma kako ste vi "biblijski hriscani" a mi smo "otpadnici od nje" i ponavljate neprestano isto kao papagaji da nas omalovazite!

No, nista ti ovo ne vredi ljudi vide ko je izvojevao pobedu, ko je Hriscanin a ko je laza! U lazi su kratke noge, a vi ste se osramotili kao niko do sada!

I zasto bismo mi ponovo davali bibliju kada vas ona ne interesuje? Ne treba prosipati bisere pred svinje. Kao svinje se i ponasate, jer sve izgazite nogama i hocete jos i da nas rastrgnete! Zelite da nam "Bog rusi hramove" da nas "utopi u poplavi" da se "mi pred vama ponizavamo" i slicno. To ste sve izjavljivali i da je nasa crkva kurva koju treba pobediti. To je vasa jedina misija i jedina zelja - naruziti i unistiti Hristovu crkvu a nas licno omalovaziti pricama kako mi ne postujemo bibliju, kako smo "ovakvi i onakvi.." , zato ste se i urotili protiv nas i kujete zavere kako da nas uklonite sa foruma!

Svi vide vasa dela, ona svedoce i pokazuju kakav vam je duh, kakvi su vam rodovi i kakvi ste kao ljudi!

Brate Mire, sve si lepo rekao ali si zaboravio jednu stvar, krucijalnu. Ne rade to oni isključivo iz gladi za pokazivanjem i pojačavanjem ega, ponižavanjem, nego da bi druge zaveli. Zar misliš da se ne ponašaju isto i prema protestantima? Ponašaju se, od samog početka od Milerovog lupetanja o datumima, ponašaju se. Ljudima su upadali na bogoslužja, odvraćali ih od odlaska u crkvu, izazivali pastore.... sada to naravno ne rade iz istog razloga, tj vikanja "evo Isusa pred vratima", na to su dodali ubeđivanje drugih da su oni u pravu. Za njih su, a to i ne kriju sve zajednice, kako protestanti, tako i Crkva, otpad, a samo su oni nosioci "biblijske" istine. Samo oni, i niko više poznaje suštinu i srž pisma. Ta njihova tvrdnja se naravno kosi sa svime što se o njima i samoj bibliji zna, ali, oni imaju i na to spremne odgovore, tipa: "sotona, laž, neprijatelji, takav vam je duh..." Da nikog ne diraju, pa da ih se ignoriše, ali oni moraju da diraju, jer ponoviću po ko zna koji put, moraju da sakupljaju sledbenike, ne zato da bi se ti jadnici "spasili", nego da bi korporacija imala profit (desetak). Da steknu te sledbenike, oni naravno ne idu kod onih koji evanđelje ne primiše, nego upravo kod onih koji Hrista poznaju. Zašto? Pa zato što adventistima i nije cilj evangelizacija, nego rušenje prave Crkve da bi se na njeno mesto postavila lažna - njihova "remnant", na meti su svi, protestanti, pravoslavni, monofiziti, i naravno katolici. Dovoljno je da je neko nezadovljan sveštenikom, ili lokalnom zajednicom, pa da u svojoj zabludelosti postane meta lovaca na duše.
 
VIP
Učlanjen(a)
14.07.2011
Poruka
19.107
Mire, nemam reči na tvoje pisanje.
Od onakvog istinoljubivog poštenog čoveka, postao si onaj koji svesno iznosi neistine.
kažem "SVESNO" jer sam znaš da je SVE što pišeš neistina, I pripisivanje svega I svačega što ne postoji, čak da ja lažem, I ako moj princip nije nikada bio da iznosim bilo kakve laži, čak ni dok sam bio u svetu bez poznanja istine I Boga.

Ono što najviše mrzim to je laž.

Druge možeš da obmaneš svojim pisanjem, ali mene ne, a ne možeš ni sebe, jer ti znaš šta je istina, ali svesno iznosiš laži.

Dakle, od tvog laganja mogu imati štete samo oni koji nisu od početka pratili diskusije, I oni koji veruju drugima a da sami ne proveravaju.

SVE što si izneo se odnosi na vas, samo promeni primaoca poruke, I pokazaće sliku onoga kakvi ste vi, I šta činite.

Pozdrav!
 
Učlanjen(a)
11.02.2009
Poruka
8.070
Mire, nemam reči na tvoje pisanje.
Od onakvog istinoljubivog poštenog čoveka, postao si onaj koji svesno iznosi neistine.
kažem "SVESNO" jer sam znaš da je SVE što pišeš neistina, I pripisivanje svega I svačega što ne postoji, čak da ja lažem, I ako moj princip nije nikada bio da iznosim bilo kakve laži, čak ni dok sam bio u svetu bez poznanja istine I Boga.

Ono što najviše mrzim to je laž.

Druge možeš da obmaneš svojim pisanjem, ali mene ne, a ne možeš ni sebe, jer ti znaš šta je istina, ali svesno iznosiš laži.

Dakle, od tvog laganja mogu imati štete samo oni koji nisu od početka pratili diskusije, I oni koji veruju drugima a da sami ne proveravaju.

SVE što si izneo se odnosi na vas, samo promeni primaoca poruke, I pokazaće sliku onoga kakvi ste vi, I šta činite.

Pozdrav!

Prvo, imate inbox pa se tu prozivajte do sutra, a drugo, ako toliko mrziš laž, šta ćeš onda kod EGWista? Ubedio te Bog? Pre će biti da te je ubedio onaj drugi kome pripisuješ božanske moći.

Pozdrav.
 
VIP
Učlanjen(a)
14.07.2011
Poruka
19.107
Prvo, imate inbox pa se tu prozivajte do sutra, a drugo, ako toliko mrziš laž, šta ćeš onda kod EGWista? Ubedio te Bog? Pre će biti da te je ubedio onaj drugi kome pripisuješ božanske moći.

Pozdrav.

Zato što Adventisti imaju istinu, jedini celokupnu stopostotnu istinu.

A vi I dalje izvrćite I lažite da je suprotno, to je vasa stvar.
 
Učlanjen(a)
11.02.2009
Poruka
8.070
Ne postoje kontradikcije sa biblijom u Adventizmu.
Stvarno?

A ovo?


AND THEY SHALL TURN AWAY THEIR EARS FROM THE TRUTH, AND SHALL BE TURNED UNTO FABLES. 2 TIMOTHY 4:4 KJV
truthorfableslogo1a1



Ellen White contradicts the Bible over fifty times
By Robert K. Sanders and Sydney Cleveland

1. Was the plan of salvation made after the fall?
EGW: YES "The kingdom of grace was instituted immediately after the fall of man, when a plan was devised for the redemption of the guilty race" (Great Controversy, p. 347).
BIBLE: NO 1 Pet 1:18 - 19 (NIV) 18For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your forefathers, 19but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect.
BIBLE: NO Eph 1:4 (NIV) 4For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight.
Note: The Gospel of salvation through grace by faith in Jesus Christ was already in existence before the creation of this world. EGW contradicts the Bible by claiming the plan of salvation was devised after the fall of Adam and Eve.

2. Was Adam with Eve when she was tempted in the garden?
EGW: NO "The angels had cautioned Eve to beware of separating herself from her husband while occupied in their daily labor in the garden; with him she would be in less temptation than if she were alone. But absorbed in her pleasing task, she unconsciously wandered from his side. On perceiving that she was alone, she felt an apprehension of danger. ... She soon found herself gazing with mingled curiosity and admiration upon the forbidden tree" (Patriarchs and Prophets, pp. 53, 54).
BIBLE: YES Gen 3:6 (NIV) 6When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.

3. Was Adam deceived by Satan?
EGW: YES "Satan, who is the father of lies, deceived Adam in a similar way, telling him that he need not obey God, that he would not die if he transgressed the law" (Evangelism, p. 598).
BIBLE: NO 1 Tim 2:14 (NIV) 14And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
Note: Who showed E. G. White that Satan deceived Adam, when the Bible says Adam was not deceived? So who is deceiving us?

4. Who spoke to Cain?
EGW: ANGEL "Through an angel messenger the divine warning was conveyed: 'If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted?'" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 74).
BIBLE: Gen 4:6 - 7, (NIV) 6Then the LORD said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it.”
Note: It is the Lord speaking to Cain in Gen 4: 6, 7, 10, 13, 15-16 not an angel messenger. SDAs often try to reconcile this contradiction by claiming the Lord spoke to Cain through an angel. If so, then why didn't the Bible tell us the truth? When Moses wrote this account, why didn't God tell Moses He spoke to Cain through an angel? Why would our omniscient God let Moses write down the wrong thing? And, if EGW is right, then Jesus was wrong when He said in John 17:17, "Your word is truth." For EGW to be right, the Bible, Moses, and Jesus Christ all have to be wrong!

5. Did pre-flood humans mate with animals and give birth to new sub-human species and races?
EGW: YES "But if there was one sin above another which called for the destruction of the race by the flood, it was the base crime of amalgamation of man and beast which defaced the image of God, and caused confusion everywhere" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 3, p. 64).
EGW: YES "Every species of animal which God had created were preserved in the ark. The confused species which God did not create, which were the result of amalgamation, were destroyed by the flood. Since the flood there has been amalgamation of man and beast, as may be seen in the almost endless varieties of species of animals, and in certain races of men" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 3, p. 75).
BIBLE: NO Gen 1:24 - 25 (NIV) 24And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. 25God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
Note: Five times in these two verses God states that animals can only reproduce according "to their own kinds." Horses cannot mate with birds and produce offspring -- neither can humans mate with monkeys and produce offspring. Even SDA scientists and the Ellen White Estate admit EGW was simply wrong.

6. Did god or an angel shut the door of Noah's ark?
EGW: ANGEL "An angel is seen by the scoffing multitude descending from heaven clothed with brightness like the lightning. He closes that massive outer door, and takes his course upward to heaven again" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 3, p. 68, written in 1864).
EGW: GOD "... God had shut it, and God alone could open it" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 98, written in 1890).
BIBLE: GOD Gen 7:16 (NIV) 16The animals going in were male and female of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the LORD shut him in.
Note: The Bible says the Lord shut Noah in, EGW disagreed in 1864 saying it was an angel who shut the door. Then twenty-six years later in 1890, she changed her mind and wrote that it really was God who shut the door. First she contradicted the Bible and then she contradicted herself. SDAs try to reconcile EGW with the Bible by saying, "Oh, God used an angel to shut the door." If so, then why doesn't the Bible tell us that? Why is it that none of the Bible prophets knew God "used an angel"? Why was this information only available to Christians through EGW? And why does her information contradict every one of the Bible writers? If the OT Bible record was wrong, then why did Jesus say the Bible is "truth" (John 17:17)? For EGW to be right, the Bible, Moses, Jesus and Ellen White herself have to be wrong!

7. Was the tower of Babel built before the flood?
EGW: YES "This system was corrupted before the flood by those who separated themselves from the faithful followers of God, and engaged in the building of the tower of Babel" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 3, p. 301).
BIBLE: NO Gen 9:28, 11:4 (NIV) 28After the flood ... they said, "Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of the whole earth"
Note: This was one of the first EGW contradictions that SDAs found and corrected. They claimed it was just a typographical error, forgetting that EGW claimed the "very word" she wrote came from God!
When writing these precious books, if I hesitated, the very word I wanted to express the idea was given to me (Selected Messages, vol. 3, pp. 51,52). 1907).
I am just as dependent upon the Spirit of the Lord in relating or writing the vision as in having the vision (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 2, p. 293).

8. Was the tower of Babel built to escape another flood?
EGW: YES "The dwellers on the plain of Shinar disbelieved God's covenant that He would not again bring a flood upon the earth. Many of them denied the existence of God and attributed the Flood to the operation of natural causes. ... One object before them in the erection of the tower was to secure their own safety in case of another deluge. By carrying the structure to a much greater height than was reached by the waters of the Flood, they thought to place themselves beyond all possibility of danger. And as they would be able to ascend to the region of the clouds, they hoped to ascertain the cause of the Flood" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 119).
BIBLE: NO Gen 11:4 (NIV) 4Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of the whole earth.”

9. Was Moses' wife Zipporah, a "Cushite?
EGW: YES "(Miriam) complained of Moses because he married an Ethiopian (Cushite) woman" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 4, p. 19).
EGW: NO "Though called a 'Cushite woman' (Numbers 12:1, R.V.), the wife of Moses was a Midianite, and thus a descendant of Abraham" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 383).
BIBLE: YES Num 12:1 (KJV) 1And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.

10. Were the Israelites destroyed by gluttony?
EGW: YES "God granted their desire, giving them flesh, and leaving them to eat till their gluttony produced a plague, from which many of them died." (Counsels on Diet and Foods, p. 148).
BIBLE: Num. 11:4 - 11:6 (NIV) 4The rabble with them began to crave other food, and again the Israelites started wailing and said, "If only we had meat to eat! 5We remember the fish we ate in Egypt at no cost—also the cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic. 6But now we have lost our appetite; we never see anything but this manna!"
Num. 11:3 - 34 (NIV) 31Now a wind went out from the LORD and drove quail in from the sea. It brought them down all around the camp to about three feet above the ground, as far as a day’s walk in any direction. 32All that day and night and all the next day the people went out and gathered quail. No one gathered less than ten homers. Then they spread them out all around the camp. 33But while the meat was still between their teeth and before it could be consumed, the anger of the LORD burned against the people, and he struck them with a severe plague. 34Therefore the place was named Kibroth Hattaavah, because there they buried the people who had craved other food.
Note: EGW says the Israelites died because their gluttony produced a plague. The Bible says God struck them with a "severe plague" because they "craved other food". Numbers 11:4, 31-35.
SDAs try to justify EGW's error by appealing to Psalm 105:40 which says: "They asked, and he brought them quail and satisfied them with the bread of heaven." However, Psalm 105:40 refers to the first time God gave His people quail to eat at the same time He began giving them manna (Exodus 16:11-13). There's nothing in Exodus 16:11-13 or Psalm 105:40 about gluttony or people dying because they ate too much meat or manna. Anyone thinking EGW was referring to Exodus 16:11-13 has to admit she contradicted the Bible by saying people died from gluttony when there was no gluttony and no one died from eating quail!
The fact is Ellen White was referring to the second time God sent quail (Numbers 11:13, 18-23, 31-34). God told them He would give them enough meat to eat for a month -- enough to eat until it "came out their nostrils!" The Bible says a wind from God blew quail into the camp until they were piled three feet deep all around the camp. And the Bible says the people went out and gathered quail all day, all night, and all another day. The Bible says after they gathered it, and spread it around the camp, the "anger of the Lord burned against the people, and he struck them with a severe plague "when the meat was still within their teeth." EGW plainly contradicted the Bible by claiming they died from gluttony when no gluttony occurred in either incident!

11. Did God send ravens to feed Elijah?
EGW: NO "There He honored Elijah by sending food to him morning and evening by an angel of heaven" (Testimonies, vol. 3, p. 288 written in 1873).
EGW: YES "He who fed Elijah by the brook, making a raven His messenger" (Testimonies,vol. 4, p. 253 written in 1876).
BIBLE: YES 1 Kin 17:4, 6(NIV) 4...I have ordered the ravens to feed you there... The ravens brought him bread and meat"
Note: In 1873 EGW contradicted the Bible when she said Elijah was fed by an angel. Then three years later in 1876 she changed her mind and agreed with the Bible that it really was a raven. Then, a year after her death, her editors tried to smooth things over by omitting any reference to either an angel or a raven—they changed EGW's words to say Elijah was just "miraculously provided with food" (Prophets and Kings, p. 129 published in 1916).

12. Did Samson disobey God when he married a Philistine?
EGW: YES "A young woman dwelling in the Philistine town of Timnath engaged Samson's affections, and he determined to make her his wife. ... The parents at last yielded to his wishes, and the marriage took place. ... The time when he must execute his divine mission -- the time above all others when he should have been true to God -- Samson connected himself with the enemies of Israel. ... He was placing himself in a position where he could not fulfill the purpose to be accomplished by his life. ... The wife, to obtain whom Samson had transgressed the command of God, proved treacherous to her husband" (Patriarchs and Prophets, pp. 562,563).
BIBLE: NO Judg 14:3- 4 (NIV) But Samson said to his father, “Get her for me. She’s the right one for me.” 4 (His parents did not know that this was from the LORD, who was seeking an occasion to confront the Philistines; for at that time they were ruling over Israel.)

13. Did the high priest carry the blood of sacrificed animals into the holy place each day?
EGW: YES "The most important part of the daily ministration was the service performed in behalf of individuals. ... By his own hand the animal was then slain, and the blood was carried by the priest into the holy place and sprinkled before the veil, behind which was the ark containing the law that the sinner had transgressed. By this ceremony the sin was, through the blood, transferred in figure to the sanctuary" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 354).
BIBLE: NO Apart from the annual Day of Atonement, the priest only sprinkled blood "before the veil" in the Holy Place on two occasions: (1) when a priest sinned (Leviticus 4:3-12); (2) when the whole Israelite community sinned (Leviticus 4:13-21). Blood was never taken into the Holy Place on a daily basis when a leader sinned (Leviticus 4:22-26), nor when an individual sinned (Leviticus 4:27-35).
Note: Thus EGW contradicted the Bible by saying the sins of the individual were "transferred in figure to the (Holy Place of the) sanctuary" "through the blood" sacrificed on a daily basis.

14. Did Christ resemble other children?
EGW: Yes 1896 "He was to be like those who belonged to the human family and the Jewish race. His features were to be like those of other human beings, and he was not to have such beauty of person as to make people point him out as different from others" (Christ Our Saviour, p. 9, Edition 1896).
EGW: No 1898 "No one, looking upon the childlike countenance, shining with animation, could say that Christ was just like other children" (Questions on Doctrine, p. 649, 1957).
BIBLE: Yes Isa 53:2 (NIV) 2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

15. Was the man Jesus Christ also truly God?
EGW: NO "The man Christ Jesus was not the Lord God Almighty" (Letter 32, 1899, quoted in the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 5, p. 1129).
BIBLE: YES Isa 9:6 (NIV) For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
BIBLE: YES Rev 1:7-8 (NIV) Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of the earth will mourn because of him. So shall it be! Amen. 'I am the Alpha and the Omega,' says the Lord God, 'who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.
BIBLE: YES Phil 2:9 (NIV) "Therefore God exalted him (Jesus) to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name.

16. While tempting Jesus, did Satan claim to be the angel who had saved Isaac from certain death?
EGW: YES "As soon as the long fast of Christ commenced in the wilderness, Satan was at hand with his temptations. He ... tried to make Christ believe that God did not require Him to pass through self-denial and the sufferings He anticipated. ... He (Satan) also stated he was the angel that stayed the hand of Abraham as the knife was raised to slay Isaac" (Selected Messages) vol. 1, p. 273).
Note: You may read the Bible from cover to cover and you will not find any evidence to validate this supposed conversation between Christ and Satan.

17. Who chose Judas to be one of Jesus' twelve disciples?
EGW: CHRIST CHOSE JUDAS "When Judas was chosen by our Lord, his case was not hopeless" (Testimonies, vol. 4, p. 41).
EGW: DISCIPLES CHOSE JUDAS "The disciples were anxious that Judas should become one of their number. ... They commended him to Jesus" (The Desire of Ages, p. 294).
EGW: JUDAS CHOSE HIMSELF "While Jesus was preparing the disciples for their ordination, one who had not been summoned urged his presence among them. It was Judas Iscariot, a man who professed to be a follower of Christ. He now came forward soliciting a place in this inner circle of disciples. ... He hoped to experience this through connecting himself with Jesus" (The Desire of Ages, pp. 293, 717).
BIBLE: JESUS CHOSE JUDAS
Luke 6:13 - 16 (NIV) 13When morning came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also designated apostles: 14Simon (whom he named Peter), his brother Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, 15Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon who was called the Zealot, 16Judas son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor.
John 6:70 - 71 (NIV) 70Then Jesus replied, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!” 71(He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)
John 15:16 (NIV) 16You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit—fruit that will last. Then the Father will give you whatever you ask in my name.

18. Did dogs eat Judas' remains?
EGW: YES " His weight had broken the cord by which he had hanged himself to the tree. In falling, his body had been horribly mangled, and dogs were now devouring it. His remains were immediately buried out of sight;" (The Desire of Ages, p. 722).
BIBLE: NO Mat 27:5 (NIV) So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself.
"With the reward he got for his wickedness, Judas bought a field; there he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out." (Acts 1:18 NIV)
Note: The Scripture is very plain, no dogs were involved in feasting on Judas's remains. This is more of EGW's, "precious light from the throne."

19. Did Herod place a tattered robe on Jesus?
EGW: YES "At the Suggestion of Herod, a crown was plaited from a vine bearing sharp thorns, and this was placed upon the sacred brow, of Jesus; and an old tattered purple robe, once the garment of a king, was placed upon his noble form." 3 Spirit of Prophecy p.138, 1887 Edition. "Behold Him clothed in that old purple robe" (1Testimonies, p. 241).
BIBLE: NO Luke 23:11 (NIV) Then Herod and his soldiers ridiculed and mocked him. Dressing him in an elegant robe, they sent him back to Pilate.
Note: Was it a tattered robe or an elegant robe that was placed on Jesus? Why would God give Ellen a different picture than the one given in Scripture?

20. Did Jesus faint three times under the cross?
EGW: YES "He was weak and feeble through pain and suffering, caused by the scourging and blows which he had received, yet they laid on him the heavy cross upon which they were soon to nail him. But Jesus fainted beneath the burden. Three times they laid on him the heavy cross, and three times he fainted" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p. 57).
BIBLE: NO Matt 27:32 (NIV) As they were going out, they met a man from Cyrene, named Simon, and they forced him to carry the cross.
BIBLE: NO Mark 15:21(NIV) A certain man from Cyrene, Simon, the father of Alexander and Rufus, was passing by on his way in from the country, and they forced him to carry the cross.
BIBLE: NO Luke 23:26 (NIV) As they led him away, they seized Simon from Cyrene, who was on his way in from the country, and put the cross on him and made him carry it behind Jesus.
Note: Nowhere in the Bible is there a single statement that Jesus fainted even once, much less three times! The Bible writers were careful to mention that there was three people crucified that day, but somehow they didn't see Jesus faint three times!

21. Did Satan tempt Christ?
In this case EGW agrees with the Bible record that Jesus was tempted at the beginning of the forty day fast. But makes heretical statements.
EGW: Start of forty days: As soon as the long fast of Christ commenced in the wilderness, Satan was at hand with his temptations. He came to Christ, enshrouded in light, claiming to be one of the angels from the throne of God, sent upon an errand of mercy to sympathize with him, and to relieve him of his suffering condition. He tried to make Christ believe that God did not require him to pass through self-denial and the sufferings he anticipated; that he had been sent from Heaven to bear to him the message that God only designed to prove his willingness to endure. Satan told Christ that he was only to set his feet in the blood-stained path, but not to travel it. Like Abraham he was tested to show his perfect obedience. He also stated that he was the angel that stayed the hand of Abraham as the knife was raised to slay Isaac, and he had now come to save his life; that it was not necessary for him to endure the painful hunger and death from starvation; he would help him bear a part of the work in the plan of salvation. (Review and Herald, August 4, 1874)
Note: Where in the Bible does it teach that Satan offered to help Jesus with the plan of salvation? If you accept this heresy, then you will not have any problem accepting the rest of EGW's claims that Satan made.
  1. sent upon an errand of mercy to sympathize with him, and to relieve him of his suffering condition.
  2. God did not require him to pass through self-denial and the sufferings he anticipated;
  3. sent from Heaven to bear to him the message that God only designed to prove his willingness to endure.
  4. He also stated that he was the angel that stayed the hand of Abraham as the knife was raised to slay Isaac, and he had now come to save his life;
  5. that it was not necessary for him to endure the painful hunger and death from starvation;
EGW: Start of forty days: "As soon as the long fast of Christ commenced, Satan was at hand with his temptations...Satan told Christ ...that it was not necessary for him to endure this painful hunger and death from starvation" (Redemption of the Temptation of Christ, p. 37 1874 Edition).
Note: Where does the Bible teach Satan telling Jesus, "that it was not necessary for him to endure this painful hunger and death from starvation"?
EGW: Start of forty days: "As soon as Christ began his fast, Satan appeared as an angel of light, and claimed to be a messenger of heaven. He told him it was not the will of God that he should suffer this pain and self denial" (Christ Our Saviour p. 45. 1 Selected Messagesp.273).
Note: Where does the Bible teach Satan telling Jesus, "it was not the will of God that he should suffer this pain and self denial"?
EGW: Start of forty days: "Forty days He was tempted of Satan" (Early Writings p.155).
EGW: After Fast : " When Jesus entered the wilderness, He was shut in by the Father’s glory...But the glory departed, and He was left to battle with temptation. For forty days he fasted and prayed... Now was Satan’s opportunity. Now he supposed he could overcome Christ." (The Desire of Ages p.118)
BIBLE: After Fast: Matt 4:1 - 4 (NIV) 1Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the devil. 2After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. 3The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.” 4Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.
BIBLE: Start of forty days: Mark 1:12 - 13 (NIV) 12At once the Spirit sent him out into the desert, 13and he was in the desert forty days, being tempted by Satan. He was with the wild animals, and angels attended him.
BIBLE: Start of forty days: Luke 4:1 - 2 (NIV) 1Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the desert, 2where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing during those days, and at the end of them he was hungry. (Luke then records Satan's three temptations at the end of the forty days. Vs 3-13 to make bread out of stones, given kingdoms to worship Satan and to prove his is the Son of God by jumping off of the Temple.)

22. Was Mary led away from the scene and Jesus' bones broken during his crucifixion?
EGW: YES "The mother of Jesus was agonized, almost beyond endurance, and as they stretched Jesus upon the cross, and were about to fasten his hands with the cruel nails to the wooden arms, the disciples bore the mother of Jesus from the scene, that she might not hear the crashing of the nails as they were driven through the bone and muscle of his tender hands and feet" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p. 58, written in 1858).
EGW: NO "His hands stretched upon the cross; the hammer and the nails were brought, and as the spikes were driven through the tender flesh, ..." (The Desire of Ages, p. 744, written in 1898).
BIBLE: NO Luke 23:27, 49, 55 (NIV) "A large number of people followed him, including women who mourned and wailed for him. ... All those who knew him, including the women who had followed him from Galilee, stood at a distance, watching these things (the crucifixion). The women who had come with Jesus from Galilee followed Joseph and saw the tomb and how his body was laid in it".
BIBLE: NO John 19:25 (NIV) Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.
BIBLE: NO John 19:25, 36 (NIV) ... These things happened so that the scriptures would be fulfilled: 'Not one of his bones will be broken'".
Note: There is no Bible record of Mary being led from the scene so she wouldn't hear the crashing of the nails through his bones. The Bible says she stood nearby with the other women watching the crucifixion and then followed the burial party to watch his interment in the tomb. The Bible tells us that Jesus, as symbolized by the Passover Lamb, was not to have any of his bones broken: Exodus 12:46; Numbers 9:12; Psalm 34:20. When EGW compiled the Desire of Ages, 40 years after she first wrote that the nails were driven through his "bone and muscle," she changed her account to read: the nails were driven "through the tender flesh."

23. Did Jesus' humanity and divinity die on the cross?
EGW: YES "In him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily. Men need to understand that Deity suffered and sank under the agonies of Calvary." (Manuscript 44, 1898, and the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 7, p. 907).
EGW: NO "The Deity did not sink under the agonizing torture of Calvary" (Letter: 1899, quoted in the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 5, page 1129).
BIBLE: YES 1 Thess 4:14 (NIV) We believe that Jesus died and rose again.
Note: The Bible repeatedly states that Jesus, the total Person, died on the cross. Four of the first heresies Christianity faced (Appolinarianism, Arianism, Docetism and Nestorianism) denied that Jesus was fully human and fully Divine as a person. Orthodox Christianity maintained the complete unity of Christ's nature in both His life and death. Thus Ellen White not only contradicted the Bible and orthodox Christianity, she also contradicted herself.

24. Did Jesus die to give us a second probation?
EGW: YES "Death entered the world because of transgression. But Christ gave his life that man should have another trial. He did not die on the cross to abolish the law of God, but to secure for man a second probation" (Testimonies to Ministers, p. 134).
BIBLE: NO 2 Cor 6:2 (NIV) I tell you, now is the time of God's favor, now is the day of salvation.
BIBLE: NO Heb 2:3 (NIV) How shall we escape if we ignore such a great salvation?
BIBLE: NO Heb 9:27-28 (NIV) Man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.
Note: The Bible clearly teaches that there is no second chance for salvation. Everyone living before Christ was saved exactly the same way as everyone living after Christ -- during their lifetime everyone accepts either God's gift of salvation through Christ or is excluded from eternal life. Jesus death on the cross was not an afterthought, not a second probation and not a second chance.

25. Was the atonement for sin completed at the cross?
EGW: NO "Instead of ... Daniel 8:14 referring to the purifying of the earth, it was now plain that it pointed to the closing work of our High Priest in heaven, the finishing of the atonement, and the preparing of the people to abide the day of His coming" (Testimonies, vol. 1, p. 58).
EGW: NO "Jesus entered the most holy of the heavenly (sanctuary), at the end of the 2300 days of Daniel 8, in 1844, to make a final atonement for all who could be benefited by His mediation" (Early Writings, p. 253).
EGW: YES "He [Christ] planted the cross between Heaven and earth, and when the Father beheld the sacrifice of His Son, He bowed before it in recognition of its perfection. "It is enough," He said. "The Atonement is complete." The Review and Herald, Sept. 24, 1901.
BIBLE: YES John 19:30 (NIV) When he had received the drink, Jesus said, 'It is finished.' With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
BIBLE: YES Rom 3:21-25 (NIV) But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood.
BIBLE: YES Rom 5:9 -11 (NIV) Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him! For if, when we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! Not only is this so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation.
Note: The Bible totally rejects EGW's idea of the 2300 days and an investigative judgment in the heavenly sanctuary beginning in 1844. Notice how the Bible texts quoted above were all written less than thirty years after Jesus' resurrection, and all clearly state that Christians living then were already fully justified, redeemed, sanctified and reconciled to God through Christ's death on the cross. As cult-watchers, Martin and Barnhouse stated: "The (SDA sanctuary doctrine) is the most colossal, psychological, face-saving phenomenon in religious history! We personally do not believe that there is even a suspicion of a verse in Scripture to sustain such a peculiar position. And we further believe that any effort to establish it is stale, flat, and unprofitable."

26. Does the blood of Christ cancel sin?
EGW: NO "The blood of Christ, while it was to release the repentant sinner from the condemnation of the law, was not to cancel sin ... it will stand in the sanctuary until the final atonement" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 357).
BIBLE: YES "In him we have ("have" is present tense) redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins" (Ephesians 1:7).
BIBLE: YES 1 John 1:7 (NIV) And the blood of Jesus, his son purifies us from every sin.
BIBLE: YES Rom 4:7-8 (NIV) Blessed are they whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him".
Note: To forgive means to pardon, give up all rights to punish, to forever cancel a debt. Jesus did all that for us when He shed His blood for us. The Bible says that forgiven sins are never counted against an individual. However Ellen White contradicts the Bible by claiming God stores up our sins and later punishes us for them if we do not measure up to His standard before the final atonement. This idea causes millions of SDAs agony as they question whether or not they will be saved.

27. Are confessed sins transferred to the heavenly sanctuary by the blood of Christ?
EGW: YES "As the sins of the people were anciently transferred in figure, to the earthly sanctuary by the blood of the sin-offering, so our sins are, in fact, transferred to the heavenly sanctuary by the blood of Christ." (Great Controversy p. 266 1886 Edition).
EGW: YES "As anciently the sins of the people were by faith placed upon the sin offering and through its blood transferred in figure to the earthly sanctuary so in the new covenant the sins of the repentant are by faith placed upon Christ and transferred, in fact, to the heavenly sanctuary." (Great Controversy p. 421 1911 Edition).
BIBLE: NO Eph1:7 NIV) But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin. 1 John 1:7 (NIV) In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God's grace.
Note: There is no Scripture to support E. G. White’s teaching that confessed sins are transferred to the heavenly sanctuary "by the blood of Christ" in 1886 and she changed it to read, "by faith placed upon Christ" and transferred to the heavenly sanctuary to be dealt with at a later date in an Investigative Judgment. The Bible teaches our confessed sins are completely covered by the blood of the Lamb.

28. Who bears our sins?
EGW: SATAN "It was seen, also, that while the sin offering pointed to Christ as a sacrifice, and the high priest represented Christ as a mediator, the scapegoat typified Satan, the author of sin, upon whom the sins of the truly penitent will finally be placed. ... Christ will place all these sins upon Satan, ... so Satan, ... will at last suffer the full penalty of sin" (Great Controversy, p. 422, 485, 486).
BIBLE: JESUS 1 Pet 2:24 (NIV) He himself (Jesus Christ) bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed.

29. Does God require a trespass offering before he pardons us?
EGW: YES "You cannot make every case right, for some whom you have injured have gone into their graves, and the account stands registered against you. In these cases the best you can do is to bring a trespass offering to the altar of the Lord, and He will accept and pardon you" (Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 339).
BIBLE: NO 1 John 1:9 (NIV) If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.
Note: Sins are forgiven by having faith in Jesus. Mark 2:5 (NIV) 5When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven.” EGW contradicts the Bible by telling you to bring a trespass offering in order to be pardoned.

30. Can we say we are saved right now by Christ's grace?
EGW: NO "Those who accept the Saviour, however sincere their conversion, should never be taught to say or feel that they are saved. ... Those who accept Christ, and in their first confidence say, I am saved, are in danger of trusting to themselves" (Christ's Object Lessons, p. 155).
BIBLE: YES 1 John 5:13 (NIV) I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.

31. Can the faith of believing parents save their children?
EGW: YES "I know that some questioned whether the little children of even believing parents should be saved, because they have had no test of character and all must be tested and their character determined by trial. The question is asked, 'How can little children have this test and trial?' I answer that the faith of the believing parents covers the children" (Selected Messages, vol. 3, p. 313).
BIBLE: NO Eze 14:17- 20 (NIV) If I bring a sword against that country ... and I kill its men and their animals, as surely as I live, declares the Sovereign Lord, even if these three men (Noah, Daniel and Job) were in it, they could not save their own sons or daughters. They alone would be saved. Or if I send a plague into that land and pour out My wrath upon it, ... even if Noah, Daniel and Job were in it, they could save neither son nor daughter. They would save only themselves by their righteousness".
BIBLE: NO Eze 18:20 (NIV) The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him (Ezekiel 18:20).
BIBLE: NO Eze 33:20 (NIV) I will judge each of you according to his own ways.

32. Will the sins of the slave be transferred to the slave master?
EGW: YES "I saw that the slave master will have to answer for the soul of his slave whom he has kept in ignorance; and the sins of the slave will be visited upon (transferred to) the master" (Early Writings, p. 276).
BIBLE: NO Eze 33:20 (NIV) "I will judge each of you according to his own ways.
BIBLE: NO Eze 18:20 (NIV) The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him. Did Judas Have a Conviction to Confess His Sin?

33. Can ignorant slaves be saved?
EGW: NO "God cannot take to heaven the slave who has been kept in ignorance and degradation, knowing nothing of God or the Bible, fearing nothing but his master's lash, and holding a lower position than the brutes" (Early Writings, p. 276).
BIBLE: YES "The true light (Jesus) that gives light to every man was coming into the world" (John 1:9).

34. Can we legitimately say "I have ceased to sin?
EGW: YES "Christ died to make it possible for you to cease to sin, and sin is the transgression of the law" (Review and Herald, vol. 71, No. 35, p. 1, August 28, 1894.)
EGW: YES "To be redeemed means to cease from sin" (Review and Herald, vol. 77, No. 39, p. 1, September 25, 1900).
EGW: YES "Those only who through faith in Christ obey all of God's commandments will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. They testify to their love of Christ by obeying all his precepts" (Manuscript 122, 1901, quoted in the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 6, p. 1118).
EGW: YES "To every one who surrenders fully to God is given the privilege of living without sin, in obedience to the law of heaven. ... God requires of us perfect obedience. We are to purify ourselves, even as he is pure. By keeping his commandments, we are to reveal our love for the Supreme Ruler of the universe" (Review and Herald, September 27, 1906, p. 8).
BIBLE: NO 1John 1:8- 9 (NIV) The blood of Jesus, his son, purifies us from all sin. If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives.
BIBLE: NO Eph 2:8 - 9 (NIV) For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith -- and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God -- not by works, so that no one can boast.

35. Will obeying the commandments earn me God's favor?
EGW: YES "To obey the commandments of God is the only way to obtain (earn) His favor" (Testimonies, vol. 4, p. 28).
BIBLE: NO Isa 64:6 (NIV) All our righteous acts are like filthy rags.
BIBLE: NO Gal 3:11 (NIV) "Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because, 'The righteous will live by faith'.

36. Does our obedience and faith reconcile us to God?
EGW: YES "Man, who has defaced the image of God in his soul by a corrupt life, cannot, by mere human effort, effect a radical change in himself. He must accept the provisions of the gospel; he must be reconciled to God through obedience to his law and faith in Jesus Christ" (Testimonies, vol. 4, p. 294).
BIBLE: NO "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast" (Ephesians 2:8, 9).
BIBLE: NO Col 1:21 - 22 (NIV) Once you were alienated from God and were enemies in your minds because of your evil behavior. But now he has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation.

37. As a Christian do I still stand condemned before God?
EGW: YES "At the time the light of health reform dawned upon us, and since that time, the questions have come home every day, 'Am I practicing true temperance in all things? ' 'Is my diet such as will bring me in a position where I can accomplish the greatest amount of good?' If we cannot answer these questions in the affirmative, we stand condemned before God" (Counsels on Diet and Foods, pp. 19, 20).
BIBLE: NO Rom 8:1 (NIV) Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
BIBLE: NO John 3:17-18 (NIV) 17For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.
BIBLE: NO John 5:24 (NIV) I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life.

38. Must I be perfect before Christ will accept me?
EGW: YES "From what was shown me, there is a great work to be accomplished for you before you can be accepted in the sight of God" (Testimonies, vol. 2, p. 84).
EGW: YES "You have a great work to do. ... It is impossible for you to be saved as you are" (Testimonies, vol. 2, p. 316).
EGW: YES "As you are, you would mar all heaven. You are uncultivated, unrefined, and unsanctified. There is no place in heaven for such a character as you now possess. ... You are further today from the standard of Christian perfection ... than you were a few months after you had received the truth" (Testimonies, vol. 3, p. 465).
BIBLE: NO Eph 2:4 - 5 (NIV) 4But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, 5made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved.
BIBLE: NO Rom 15:7 (NIV) 7Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God.
BIBLE: NO Acts 15:8 - 9 (NIV) 8God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9He made no distinction between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith.

39. Did Jesus enter the most holy place of the heavenly temple before October 22, 1844?
EGW: NO "I was shown that ... the door was opened in the most holy place in the heavenly sanctuary, where the ark is, in which are contained the ten commandments. This door was not opened until the mediation of Jesus was finished in the holy place of the sanctuary in l844. Then Jesus rose up and shut the door of the holy place, and opened the door into the most holy, and passed within the second veil, where he now stands by the ark" (Early Writings, p. 42).
BIBLE: YES Heb 8:1 - 2 (NIV) The point of what we are saying is this: We do have such a high priest, who sat down at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, and who serves in the sanctuary, the true tabernacle set up by the Lord, not by man (Hebrews 8:1, 2 written in 60 AD).
BIBLE: YES Heb 9:12 (NIV) He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption (Hebrews 9:12 written in 60 AD).
Note: Both these Bible texts were written in 60 A.D., and they both state Jesus was already ministering the in the Most Holy Place of the heavenly sanctuary at least 1,824 years before 1844. Ellen White's 1844 scenario simply contradicts the clearest Scriptures!

40. Are the forgiven sins of the saints not blotted out until the great day of final award?
EGW: YES "The blood of Christ, while it was to release the repentant sinner from the condemnation of the law, was not to cancel the sin; it would stand on record in the sanctuary until the final atonement. ... In the great day of final award, the dead are to be 'judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works' (Revelation 20:12). Then by virtue of the atoning blood of Christ, the sins of all the truly penitent will be blotted from the books of heaven" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 357).
BIBLE: NO Heb 8:12 (NIV) For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.”
BIBLE: NO Isa 43:25 (NIV) I, even I, am he who blots out your transgressions, for my own sake, and remembers your sins no more.
Note: The Bible is very certain that the moment God forgives our sins they are forever removed, blotted out, canceled and forgotten. First John 1:9 tells us the instant we confess our sins we receive God's forgiveness through his grace. By contradicting these Scriptures EGW turns God's overwhelming mercy into a sham. God is recreated into a lying, malevolent, heavenly bookkeeper who manipulates Divine records to make it only appear that we are forgiven. For EGW, our forgiveness does not depend upon God's grace, but upon our "works."

41. Did Paul learn the gospel from men in the church?
EGW: YES "Paul must receive instruction in the Christian faith and move accordingly. Christ sends him to the very disciples whom he had been so bitterly persecuting, to learn of them. ... Now Paul was in a condition to learn of those whom God had ordained to teach the truth. Christ directs Paul to His chosen servants, thus placing him in connection with His church. The very men whom Paul was purposing to destroy were to be his instructors in the very religion that he had despised and persecuted" (Testimonies, vol. 3, p. 430).
BIBLE: NO Gal 1:11 - 12 (NIV) I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not something that man made up. I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.
BIBLE: NO Gal 1:16 - 19 (NIV) ...to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen days. I saw none of the other apostles—only James, the Lord’s brother. I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie.

42. What is "the seal of God"?
EGW: SABBATH "The enemies of God's law, from the ministers down to the least among them, have a new conception of truth and duty. Too late they see that the Sabbath of the fourth commandment is the seal of the living God" (Great Controversy, p. 640).
BIBLE: HOLY SPIRIT Eph 1:13 (NIV) And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit,
BIBLE: HOLY SPIRIT Eph 4:30 (NIV) And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, with whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.

43. Are we required to kneel every time we pray?
EGW: YES "Where have our brethren obtained the idea that they should stand upon their feet praying to God? One who has been educated about five years in Battle Creek was asked to lead in prayer before Sister White should speak to the people. But as I beheld him standing upright upon his feet while his lips were about to open in prayer to God, my soul was stirred within me to give him an open rebuke. Calling him by name, I said, "Get down on your knees! This is the proper position always" (Selected Messages, book 2, p. 311).
EGW: YES "Both in public and private worship, it is our duty to bow down before God when we offer our petitions to Him" (Selected Messages, book 2, p. 311).
EGW: YES "To bow down when in prayer to God is the proper attitude to occupy" (Selected Messages, book 2, p. 312).
EGW: NO "We need not wait for an opportunity to kneel before God. We can pray and talk with the Lord wherever we may be" (Selected Messages, book 3, p. 266).
EGW: NO "It is not always necessary to bow upon your knees in order to pray" (Selected Messages, book 3, p. 267).
BIBLE: NO Luke 18:13 (NIV) But the tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, "God have mercy on me, a sinner.
BIBLE: NO Mark 11:25( NIV) And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.
Note: This is just another example of EGW contradicting herself and the Bible. Elder D. E. Robinson, EGW's secretary from 1902- 1915 said he had been present "repeatedly at camp meetings and General Conference sessions in which sister White herself has offered prayer ... standing'" (Selected Messages, book 3, p. 266).

44. Will people be lost because their pastor is untidy?
EGW: YES "The loss of some souls at last will be traced to the untidiness of the minister" (Selected Messages, book 3, p. 25l).
BIBLE: NO Eze 33:20 (NIV) I will judge each of you according to his own ways.
BIBLE: NO Eze 18:20 (NIV) "The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him.

45. Is it a sin to be sick?
EGW: YES "It is a sin to be sick; for all sickness is the result of transgression" (Counsels on Health, p. 37).
BIBLE: NO Job 2:7 (NIV) So Satan went out from the presence of the LORD and afflicted Job with painful sores from the soles of his feet to the top of his head. Job 2:10 (NIV) 10... In all this, Job did not sin in what he said.
Note: It is a matter of record that Ellen White was sick a lot --does that mean she sinned a lot?

46. Will God prevent the wicked from killing his people who refuse to receive the mark of the beast?
EGW YES "God would not suffer (allow) the wicked to destroy those who were expecting translations and who would not bow to the decree of the beast or receive his mark. I saw that if the wicked were permitted to slay the saints, Satan and all his evil host and all who hate God, would be gratified. ... The swords that were raised to kill God's people broke and fell powerless as a straw. Angels of God shielded the saints" (Early Writings, pp. 284, 285).
BIBLE: NO Rev 20:4 (NIV) I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshipped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

47. Do the wicked try to repent as they experience the seven last plagues?
EGW: YES "The plagues were falling upon the inhabitants of the earth. Some were denouncing God and cursing Him. Others rushed to the people of God and begged to be taught how they might escape His judgments (repentance). -- Those who had not prized God's Word were hurrying to and fro, wandering from sea to sea, and from the north to the east, to seek the Word of the Lord (repentance). ... What would they not give for one word of approval from God (repentance)! But no, they must hunger and thirst on" (Early Writings, p. 28l).
BIBLE: NO Rev 16:9 - 11 (NIV) 9They were seared by the intense heat and they cursed the name of God, who had control over these plagues, but they refused to repent and glorify him. 10The fifth angel poured out his bowl on the throne of the beast, and his kingdom was plunged into darkness. Men gnawed their tongues in agony 11and cursed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, but they refused to repent of what they had done. Rev 16:21 (NIV) ...And they cursed God on account of the plague of hail, because the plague was so terrible.
Note: Once again, the "vision" Ellen White saw is contrary to the Bible record.

48. Can Satan answer prayers directed to God?
EGW: YES "Satan appeared to be by the throne, trying to carry on the work of God. I saw them (Christians) look up to the throne, and pray, 'Father, give us Thy Spirit.' Satan would then breathe upon them an unholy influence ..." (Early Writings, p. 56).
BIBLE: NO Matt 7:11( NIV) If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!
BIBLE: NO Matt 18:19 (NIV) Again, I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything you ask for, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven.
Note: The idea that Satan answers prayers address to our heavenly Father not only contradicts the Bible -- it also makes a complete mockery of the power of God. Ellen White's "god" is so impotent that Satan can take His place!

49. Will we know the exact day and hour of Christ's second coming?
EGW: YES "As God has shown me in holy vision ... we heard the voice of God like many waters, which gave us the day and hour of Jesus' coming" (Early Writings, pp. 15, 34, 285).
BIBLE: NO Matt 25:13 (NIV) Therefore, keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour.
BIBLE: NO Matt 24:36 (NIV) "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angles in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

50. Does Jesus return to earth at the stroke of midnight?
EGW: YES "It was at midnight that God chose to deliver his people. As the wicked were mocking around them, suddenly the sun appeared, shining in his strength, and the moon stood still" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p. 205).
BIBLE: NO Matt 25:13 (NIV) Therefore, keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour.
BIBLE: NO Acts 1:7 (NIV) "It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.

51. Will the saved have wings in the resurrection?
EGW: YES "We gathered about Jesus, and just as He closed the gates of the city, the curse was pronounced upon the wicked. The gates were shut. Then the saints used their wings and mounted to the top of the wall of the city" (Early Writings, p. 53).
BIBLE: NO Phil 3:21 (NIV) "Who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.

52. Could Jesus see through the portals of the tomb?
EGW: NO "The Saviour could not see through the portals of the tomb. Hope did not present to Him His coming forth from the grave a conqueror, or tell Him of the Father’s acceptance of the sacrifice" (The Desire of Ages p. 753).
BIBLE: YES "The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, be crucified and on the third day be raised again." (Luke 24:7 NIV) "Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days." (John 2:19 NIV) "The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life--only to take it up again." (John 10:17 NIV) "No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father." (John 10:18 NIV)
BIBLE: YES Matt 26:64 (NIV) Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied. "But I say to all of you: In the future you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven."
Note: E. G. White tells us Jesus could not see through the portals of the tomb and yet he told his followers what would happen after his death, He would rise up after three days. Jesus also told Caiaphas, "In the future" he would return. Who is telling the truth, Jesus or EGW? Who or what prompted Mrs. White to tell us this deception?

53. Did Enoch think to save Sodom?
EGW: Yes "He [Enoch] did not make his abode with the wicked. He did not locate in Sodom, thinking to save Sodom. He placed himself and his family where the atmosphere would be as pure as possible. Then at times he went forth to the inhabitants of the world with his God-given message. Every visit he made to the world was painful to him. He saw and understood something of the leprosy of sin. After proclaiming his message, he always took back with him to his place of retirement some who had received the warning. Some of these became overcomers, and died before the Flood came. But some had lived so long in the corrupting influence of sin that they could not endure righteousness (MS 42, 1900). S.D.A. Bible Commentary Vol. 1, page 1087, paragraph 10.
BIBLE: NO This statement contradicts the Bible, as there is no reference to Sodom existing before the flood. The first reference to Sodom is after the flood. There is no Bible truth that Enoch was thinking about saving Sodom when it did not exist in Enoch's day. Why did the publishers of Maranatha, leave out all EGW references to Enoch and Sodom? "He [Enoch] did not make his abode with the wicked. . . . He placed himself and his family where the atmosphere would be as pure as possible. Then at times he went forth to the inhabitants of the world with his God-given message. . . . After proclaiming his message, he always took back with him to his place of retirement some who had received the warning." Maranatha p. 184.

54. Does Jesus pray to the Father for us?
EGW: YES At the very first expression of penitence, Christ presents the humble suppliant's petition before the throne as his own desire in the sinner's behalf. He says, "I will pray the Father for you." (Youth's Instructor, Jan. 16, 1896 par. 4; see also Review and Herald, May 18, 1876 par. 38)
BIBLE: NO John 16:26-27 (NIV) In that day you will ask in my name. I am not saying that I will ask the Father on your behalf. No, the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God.

ADDENDUM: Additions to EGW Contradictions
EGW: "Chedorlaomer, king of Elam, had invaded Canaan fourteen years before, and made it tributary to him. Several of the princes now revolted, and the Elamite king, with four allies, again marched into the country to reduce them to submission" (emphasis supplied). Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 134.
Bible: Gen 14:8-9 (NIV) Then the king of Sodom, the king of Gomorrah, the king of Admah, the king of Zeboiim and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar) marched out and drew up their battle lines in the Valley of Siddim against Kedorlaomer king of Elam, Tidal king of Goiim, Amraphel king of Shinar and Arioch king of Ellasar—four kings against five.
"Bera king of Sodom, Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar)" (verse 2; cf. verse 8, where only the towns are mentioned).
The Bible itself explicitly summarizes the number of allies for us as "four kings against five" (verse 9), the four being foreign, and the five being local. We are not to consider the occurrence of 'four' in verse 11 in the NIV, as that isn't the original wording. In any case, it is obvious that Kedorlaomer had three allies.
So much for inspiration and visions of the great controversy! The visions seem to have been somewhat blurred.

SUMMARY
Ellen White once stated: "The Bible must be your counselor. Study it and the testimonies God has given; for they never contradict His Word" (Selected Messages, vol. 3, p. 32).
From the evidence you have seen, do you think Ellen White's writings ("testimonies") "never contradict" God's Word? Isn't it clear that even by denying that she contradicts the Bible, she is simply proving that she cannot be trusted?


Ellen G. White's Additions to the Holy Bible
1. Did Satan repent after his fall?
EGW: YES "After Satan was shut out of heaven, with those who fell with him, he realized that he lost all the purity and glory of heaven forever. Then he repented and wished to be reinstated in heaven. He was willing to take his proper place, or any place that might be assigned him. ... He and his follower repented, wept and implored to be taken back into the favor of God. But no, their sin their hate, their envy and jealousy, had been so great that God could not blot it out. It must remain to receive its final punishment" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p. 18, 19).
Note: Not Biblical But, in Matthew 18:21-22, Jesus told Peter to forgive seventy times seven (490 times). If Ellen White was right, then it is strange that God expected more from Peter than He was willing to do Himself by refusing to forgive Satan! Wouldn't Christ have been willing to die in Satan's place—had Satan repented? Is God really unmerciful and unforgiving?

2. Adam was more than twice as tall as men today.
EGW: YES "As Adam came forth from the hand of his Creator....He was more than twice as tall as men now living upon the earth....Eve was not quite as tall as Adam. Her head reached a little above his shoulders." (Spiritual Gifts, Vol. III p. 34).
EGW: YES "Adam’s height was much greater than that of men who now inhabit the earth. Eve was somewhat less in stature;" (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 45).
Note: Not Biblical The Bible does not tell us the height of Adam and Eve, but Ellen does not leave us in doubt as to their height.

3. In the fires of hell, do the wicked feel pain as long as there is one piece of flesh left?
EGW: Yes "I saw that some were quickly destroyed, while others suffered longer. ... Some were many days consuming, and just as long as there was a portion of them unconsumed, all the sense of suffering was there" (Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p. 217).
Note: Not Biblical What if their brain is consumed first; will they still feel pain? Can a finger feel pain after the rest of the body is destroyed? Where is a Bible text to support this error?

4. Did Judas have a conviction to confess his sin?
EGW: 1898 YES "When the Saviour’s hands were bathing those soiled feet, and wiping them with the towel, the heart of Judas thrilled through and through with the impulse then and there to confess his sin." (The Desire of Ages, p. 645).
EGW: 1902 NO "As Christ celebrated this ordinance with His disciples, conviction came to the hearts of all save Judas." (Evangelism, p. 275).
Note: Mrs. White said yes in 1898 and God and Ellen changed their minds in 1902 and said no. This kind of inspiration is very hard to keep up with. I am thankful that the prophets of the Bible did not have this problem.

5. Was John cast into a caldron of boiling oil before being banished to the Isle of Patmos?
EGW: YES "John was cast into a caldron of boiling oil; but the Lord preserved the life of His faithful servant even as he preserved the three Hebrews in the fiery furnace. By the emperor’s decree John was banished to the Isle of Patmos" (Acts of the Apostles, p. 570).
Note: Not Biblical The miracles of life preservation have been recorded in Scripture to glorify God and to give us confidence in God’s mercies. It seems strange that John chose not to glorify God with this miracle as Paul did when God delivered him and as recorded in Daniel of the fiery furnace and Daniel in the Lion’s den. If this miracle happened to me, being delivered from boiling oil, I would be shouting it from the housetops. It took God 2000 years to get this information to us by way of Ellen G. White. Why was it important for the Seventh-day Adventist Church to know about this miracle and not to have it recorded in Scripture for the encouragement of the Saints that went through persecutions? To believe this, one must have tremendous faith or be a deluded individual.

6. The Herod mistake and cover-up.
E. G. White was under the impression that the Herod that took part in Jesus’ trial was the same Herod that took the life of James. She did not realize that it was Herod Antipas who took part in Jesus’ trial and Herod Agrippa I who put James to death. This mistake was due to her ignorance of the Bible and Bible history.
Writing under inspiration; E. G. White wrote in 1858 that, "Herod’s heart grew still harder, and when he heard that JESUS had arisen, he was not much troubled. He took the life of James; and when he saw that this pleased the Jews, he took Peter also, intending to put him to death." (Spiritual Gifts, Vol 1, p.71).
Note: The cover-up This error was never corrected in the revisions of Early Writings. But when the error was discovered the authors tried to fix it by a footnote on page 185 of Early writings saying it was, "the same Herodian spirit only in another personality." Notice Ellen was talking under inspiration about an individual, Herod, not the spirit of an individual or their attributes. Jesus certainly knew the difference between the Herods and the reason Ellen did not, was that she was not inspired and did not have the gift of prophecy.

7. John the Baptist knew that he was going to die.
EGW: YES "He knew that when Jesus should establish himself as a teacher, he must die" (Spiritual Gifts Vol. 1, p. 29).
Note: Not Biblical There is no Bible record of John knowing when he was going to die.

8. Mary, the sister of Martha and Lazarus, was Mary Magdalene, and she was led into sin by Simon.
EGW: YES The Feast At Simons’ House. "Simon had led into sin the woman he now despised. "It was Mary who poured upon His head the precious anointing oil, and bathed His feet with her tears. Mary was first at the tomb after the resurrection." (The Desire of Ages p. 566,568).
Note: Mary, the sister of LAZARUS is never identified as Mary Magdalene, nor is it ever suggested from the Bible that Simon led Mary into sin and despised her.

9. Jesus’ brothers were older than he and they were the sons of Joseph and sided with the rabbis.
EGW: YES "All this displeased His brothers. Being older than Jesus, they felt that He should be under their dictation. His brothers, as the sons of Joseph were called, sided with the rabbis. They insisted that the traditions must be heeded, as if they were the requirements of God." (The Desire of Ages, p.86,87.)
Note: Not Biblical Ellen G. White adds to the Bible the same way that Joseph Smith does in the "Book of Mormon". How can Adventist claim that the Bible is the source of their faith and accept this as "the truth", and do it with a straight face?

10. Angels need a gold card to get into and out of heaven.
EGW: YES "All angels that are commissioned to visit earth hold a golden card, which they present to the angels at the gates of the city." (Early Writings, p. 39).
Note: Not Biblical If this statement came from Joseph Smith would you accept it? No, because it is not found in the Bible. Then using the same principle for defining you faith how can you believe EGW's nonsense as truth? Does God who can number the hairs on our head, need a gold card to identify the angels? Why have angels at the gate when an ATM machine would work just as well?

11. Ellen G. White the only prophet given wings while in vision.
EGW: YES "The Lord has given me a view of other worlds. Wings were given me, and an angel attended me from the city to a place that was bright and glorious." (Early Writings p. 39).
Note: Not Biblical No Bible prophet was ever given wings at any time. Why were wings given to Ellen White in her vision? In vision they would not be necessary for travel. She certainly had a vivid imagination.

12. Marriages are to be discouraged.
EGW: YES In 1885 EGW wrote, "In this age of the world, as the scenes of earth’s history are soon to close and we are about to enter upon the time of trouble such as never was, the fewer the marriages contracted, the better for all, both men and women." 5 Testimonies, p. 366.
Also in 1885, "The time has come when, in one sense, they that have wives be as though they had none." (Ellen G. White, MS 34, The White Estate, 1885. Quoted in Are Seventh-Day Adventists False Prophets? p.29 by Wallace D. Slattery).
Note: Not Biblical To my knowledge Adventist Pastors today have not been discouraging any marriages. This is evident that they do not accept this teaching. The Bible was written for us and it does not ever discourage Christian marriages. The Bible does speak about marriage in the last days, calling those that forbid marriages, "liars."
"The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth" (1 Timothy 4:1-3 NIV).

13. Do we have power in ourselves?
EGW: NO 1862 "If Satan can so befog and deceive the human mind as to lead mortals to think that there is an inherent power in themselves to accomplish great and good works, they cease to rely upon God to do for them that which they think there is power in themselves to do" (1 Testimony, p. 294).
EGW: YES 1870 "We all have a warfare before us, and must stand in a position to resist the temptations of Satan; and we want to know that we possess the power in ourselves to do this (Councils on Diet and Foods, p.169).

14. Is tithe paying a pre-requisite for praying for the sick?
EGW: YES "Prayer For the Sick ¾ We should first find out if the sick one has been withholding tithes or has made trouble in the church" (Healthful Living, p. 237).
Note: Not Biblical This teaching would prohibit praying for sick non Christian friends and relatives as well as Christians of other faiths that are sick that do not believe tithing is a requirement for the Christian Church. I could not find any example of Jesus or the Apostles checking on anyone’s tithing performance before they healed them. I have never seen any Adventist Pastor follow Ellen’s ("inspired?") on this teaching. If you really believe that Ellen G. White is a prophetess then you will have to check and see if the sick is a tithe payer before you pray for them. Put your faith to the test, are you going to follow Jesus or Ellen?

15. The redeemed are to fill the vacancies in heaven left by Satan and his angels.
EGW: YES "The vacancies made in heaven by the fall of Satan and his angels will be filled by the redeemed of the Lord" (Watchman Nov. 78, 1905).
EGW: YES "It was God’s purpose to repopulate Heaven with the human race, if after the test and trial they proved to be loyal to Him" (Signs of the Times, May 29, 1909).
Note: Not Biblical The Bible never mentions that the redeemed will take the place of Satan and the fallen Angels nor does Scripture say that it is God's purpose to repopulate heaven with the human race. The Scripture does say that God is creating a New Earth for the redeemed. See Revelation 21:1.


Seventh-day Adventism's claim
Seventh-day Adventism claims to be people of the Bible and that their beliefs are supported by Scripture. They reject the Roman Catholic Church beliefs such as, praying to Mary and the saints, the confessional, rosary, holy water, the Pope as head of the church, etc. They reject Joseph Smith and his book of Mormon, they reject Mary Baker Eddy and her book Science and Health with Keys to Scripture. They reject the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which have the Watchtower to guide them. SDAs reject all beliefs that cannot be supported by the Bible. The paradox is, that the church accepts Ellen White's additions to the Bible and her contradictions without question. And then, like any other cult, expects members to do likewise. These additions to Scripture may seem too trivial to even mention. However, the church insists all these additions and contradictions came straight from God, thus making God a part of their deception.

How is this possible? Seventh-day Adventism tells us:
"The writings of Mrs. E. G. White were never designed to be an addition to the canon of Scripture. They are, never-the less, the messages of God to the remnant church and should be received as such as were the messages of the prophets of old. As Samuel was a prophet to Israel in his day, as Jeremiah was a prophet to Israel in the days of the captivity, as John the Baptist came as a special messenger of the Lord to prepare the way for Christ’s appearing, so we believe that Mrs. White was a prophet to the Church of Christ today. And the same as the messages of the prophets were received in olden times, so her messages should be received at the present time" (Review and Herald, October 4, 1928).
Note: Christians accept the writing of the prophets, Samuel, Jeremiah, as inspired by God and their writings as Holy Scripture. To follow what the SDA Church tells its members, then those who believe that E. G. White is inspired would have to regard her writings as Scripture (the same way) as they do the Bible prophets. But then the church tells them her writings are not "an addition to the canon of Scripture!" Does this confuse you? If you understand how it is possible, please explain it to me!

Did Ellen G. White claim infallibility for the Testimonies? Yes.
"Yet, now when I send you a testimony of warning and reproof, many of you declare it to be merely the opinion of Sister White. You thereby insulted the Spirit of God." Testimonies 5, p. 64.
"In these letters which I write, in the testimonies I bear, I am presenting to you that which the Lord has presented to me. I do not write one article in the paper expressing merely my own ideas. They are what God has opened before me in vision--the precious rays of light shining from the throne." Testimonies 5, p. 67.
"If you lessen the confidence of God’s people in the testimonies He has sent them, you are rebelling against God as were Korah, Dathan, and Abriam." Testimonies 5, p. 66.
"The Testimonies are of the Spirit of God, or of the devil. In arraying yourself against the servants of God you are doing a work either for God or for the devil." Testimonies 4, p. 230.



sa sajta
Kod:
http://truthorfables.com/EGW_Contradicts.htm
 
Natrag
Top