БРАВО ТОМИЦЕ, ДОКАЗАО СИ ДА СИ НАЈМОРАЛНИЈИ ЧОВЕК У СРПСКОЈ МЕДИЦИНИ ДО САДА!!! http://srb.time.mk/cluster/c02e9e0a0c/tomica-dao-ostavku-premijer-prihvatio.html
ПОТПУНО МОРАЛНО И НОРМАЛНО, СВАКА ВАМ ЧАСТ, ОСТАЛЕ БИТАНГЕ НЕКА ТРУНУ У ПАКЛУ!!!
ТОМИЦА МИЛОСАВЉЕВИЋ, ЗА РАЗЛИКУ ОД ДРУГИХ ЈЕ ДОКАЗАО ДА СЕ ПОНАША КАО ЧОВЕК!!!
У СРБИЈИ СУ МНОГО ПРЕ ТОМИЦЕ ТРЕБАЛИ ДА ПОДНЕСЗ ОСТАВКУ, ПОСТАЋЕМО "НЕБЕСКИ НАРОД" ЈЕР СУ ЉУДИ ГРАМЗИВИ И ВОЛЕ САМО СЕБЕ!!! НИСУ СЕ УСУДИЛИ НА ТАЈ МОРАЛАН И ЉУДСКИ ЧИН!!! СВКА ТИ ЧАСТ ТОМИЦЕ И ЈА БИХ ОЧИНИО ИСТО, МАДА ЈЕ ШТЕТА НЕНАДОКНАДИВА, ТИ СИ НЕВИНА ЖРТВА НЕЗНАЛИЦА И УБИЦА СРБИЈЕ!!!! ДЕМОКРАТСКИ 1000%
СВИ СМО МИ ЖРТВЕНИ ЈАРЦИ У НЕЧИЈЕМ БОЛЕСНОМ ИНТЕРЕСУ!!!! http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%96%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D1%98%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86
СХВАТИЋЕ!!!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aG-OonMVElw
Dodato posle 9 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
НАУЧНИ ПОГЛЕД НА ДУШУ!!!http://krishna.org/the-scientific-theory-of-the-soul/
The Soul—A Scientific Overview
For many centuries the soul has been the subject of much philosophical, metaphysical and religious speculation. This speculation has left many ancient questions that remain largely ignored by modern science. As examples, consider the following questions:
Does the soul exist?
Is reincarnation possible?
Can the soul survive bodily death?
Can the soul exist separate from the body?
If there is an immortal soul, what kind of thing is it?
What is the relationship between the soul and the body?
Does a soul have existence before birth or before conception?
After death, might compensation for the inequities of life be visited on the soul?
Is man endowed with three kinds of souls: The rational, the irrational common to man and other animals and the vegetative, related to growth, inherited traits and evolution?
The scientific method compels us to not make hypotheses about alleged phenomena or other concepts that lack experimental evidence. However, applying a scientific approach towards the understanding of both the meanings and possibilities implicit in concepts referred to by "soul" can prove rewarding.
New scientific developments have advanced our understanding of how computational processes take place. This makes it possible to gain new insights into questions that have arisen, since antiquity, when thinking about the concept of the soul. We can now make scientifically correct quantitative theories and mechanistic models that address such questions. This understanding comes from a different direction than what has been explored in the past. Our results fit into the existing framework of philosophical, metaphysical and religious beliefs about the human soul in a new way. A modern definition of “soul” and a scientific approach will enable us to see what a soul might be and how it might work. We will attempt to answer the nine questions above in a new context.
In this paper we start with a new definition of what the meaning of “soul” might be. Then, based on that definition we will explain in detail what the soul is made of, how it works, how it might survive us in death, and much more. All of these conclusions will be obviously true to any person who makes the effort to understand what is written here. There is just one proviso, and that is the necessity of understanding the concepts about information and information processes that have been discovered through familiarity with computers and with what it is that computers can do. Geometry starts with simple definitions, axioms and postulates and proceeds to prove ever more complex theorems whose truth might not have been obvious a priori. For all such theorems, the proofs must rely on the underlying assumptions. If we assume the validity of the axioms, postulates and theorems used in the proof of a new theorem, and assuming that the proof is done correctly, we can assume that the new theorem is true.
With regard to the soul, we do not wish to proceed in a rigorous, Euclidean fashion, (even if we knew how) however our approach is similar in one respect. We make certain assumptions and then give an objective and simple definition of the human soul. We will then try to convince the reader that our definition corresponds to the common notion of what the human soul is, based on the following criteria: The definition should make sense for all aspects of the human soul for which we have objective, scientific observations. Once we have a definition that meets the objective criteria, we will show that such a soul can have many of the other properties that have been attributed to the soul despite the lack of objective evidence. The approach is to define something in a straightforward manner and then to elaborate on the properties of what has been defined. What may be controversial is that we shall call the thing that we have defined, “soul”. We believe that the version of the soul defined herein covers many possibilities for differing definitions of human soul in the sense that it gives plausible explanations for most of the properties and possibilities of the soul that have been discussed in the literature.
How could a new definition of the human soul be in good agreement with prior definitions? Every different concept of the human soul must differ in some respects from other concepts. The definition here is perhaps much more different than the average, but it seems to capture the essence of many views of the nature of the soul. Our effort is not to decide on what properties the human soul has or ought to have, but rather to see how various properties could be true of the soul, once we have an understanding of a plausible model of the soul.
At this point, we need to define our use of a word that represents the key concept; essential to the understanding of what follows. The word is “informational”, and the definition is: Pertaining to the arrangement of things that represent discrete, digital information, independent of what the things are. Informational implies that there is meaning associated with the information, and that the information is in a form amenable to being used, communicated or modified by an information process (basically some form of generalized computer). Such digital information can be static (so called Read Only Memory, printed literature, or music on a CD) or dynamic (engaged in information processing, sensing, control or communication, such as the memory contents of a working computer or music being played from a CD). Dynamic digital information is engaged in an information process (computation) where as a consequence some of the digital information may be changed. A computer, built out of silicon chips, is not an informational construct. The reason is that although the physical parts of a computer do information processing, the information represented by the parts themselves are fixed and cannot themselves be processed and changed. The digital information being processed by the computer is an informational construct. It is possible to have a computer that is purely informational; if we write a simulator for a computer that runs on another ordinary computer, then that simulated computer is an informational construct, but the ordinary computer is not.
Before we go into the detail about the soul, as we shall define it, we will mention some conclusions revealed by our study. In general, the conclusions are not about what is true today, but about what could be true in the future regarding the nine questions posed earlier:
· What is herein defined as the soul certainly does exist.
· Reincarnation is possible, but not in ways previously imagined.
· The soul may, in partial or nearly total form, survive the death of the body.
· The partial or nearly total soul may be able to exist separate from the body.
· The soul is potentially an immortal informational construct; thus a part of physics.
· Normally, the body is the abode of much of the soul, but not necessarily so.
· Certain parts of the soul do exist before birth or conception.
· Justice after death implies that a soul can continue in existence, more or less intact, even after death. Today, only fragments of a soul can survive the death of a person. This may change sometime in the future.
· It does seem that the soul does come in the very three forms mentioned in the EB. We will explain this in more detail.
We must caution the reader that the nine points above will likely be misunderstood until reading further. For example, we are certain that the laws of physics do not prohibit the survival of a person’s soul, largely intact, after the death of that person’s body. However, we do not believe that such an event has yet occurred.
Our definition of a particular human’s soul is going to be much like the definition of a particular human’s body. While most humans start out with a complete and normal body, some do not. Additionally, a person may be maimed and still survive as a human. An amputee may not possess a complete and normal human body, but he or she is still a human being. Our bodies are normally made up of arms, legs, kidneys, brain cells, a head full of hair, tonsils, etc. A bald man, someone with no kidneys, a quadruple amputee or a paraplegic is still a human. In order to understand our definition of “souls” we need to understand that a soul is made up of many parts, that not all souls in human bodies have all of the parts that other souls have and that parts of a humans soul can exist outside of that human’s body just as one persons kidney can be removed and can remain alive, disconnected from the rest of the body, long enough to be transplanted into another person. Further, just as a tissue culture taken from a person, such as Helen Lane, may continue to live in laboratories for decades, parts of a human soul may continue to exist and even function outside of the human body. Finally, our bodies do not disappear with our death. Similarly our DNA can survive our death and remain intact and accessible. Some of our DNA along with many other fragments of our soul may survive in our children, we will show various other ways in which parts of a human soul can also survive after the death of its body.
We are now ready to give our definition of “soul” followed by a paraphrased (in light of our new definition) third paragraph from the quote, at the beginning of this paper, taken from the Encyclopaedia Britannica, MDCCLXXI (1771 AD), Volume III, pages 618-619.
The soul in every living thing is the informational parts of that thing that are purposefully engaged in the informational aspects of its ability to be conceived or germinate, grow with cells differentiating, grow further in size, move, make use of sensory information, react reflexively, learn, behave instinctually, think intelligently, communicate with other beings, teach, reproduce, evolve and in general carry out informational interactions starting with the combining of parental DNA, informational interactions with itself, with things external to itself through senses, actions, constructions, creations and communications, and with its progeny through contributed DNA. A soul can learn from experience, from reflection or by being taught by other souls. In turn, a soul can teach other souls.
Thus the soul is an immaterial substance and its primary operations of willing and thinking have not only no connection with the known properties of the elements of body, but seem plainly inconsistent with some of a body's most essential qualities. The soul is an informational entity, which is constructed out of the states and the arrangements of material things. Yet it is immaterial, in the sense that the particular choice of material, whose states and arrangements represent the bits of digital information, is not of great consequence. If the entire informational structure of a soul was transferred intact into a suitable new host, it could continue in existence largely as the same soul.
First we will define a dynamic soul. Second we will define a static soul.
A dynamic soul is just what we normally think of as the soul of a living, awake and active being. It is something that seems to inhabit a living body that is the essence of the ongoing intellectual and emotional activity of that person. It is the soul, with the help of the brain and the body, that contemplates, reflects, feels, thinks, learns, communicates, decides and commands the body to do its bidding. It is the home of processes that implement our ethical, moral and religious convictions. In our view, the dynamic soul makes use of the brain in doing its thinking and also makes use of the body to manipulate things in the real world, to receive information through the senses and to communicate with other souls.
A static soul is simply digital information that is similar to a combination of computer programs and computer data. A static soul cannot be understood without understanding the exact processes that interpret and process the information that corresponds to computer programs, and understanding the nature and intent of the part that corresponds to computer data, which is certainly complexly encoded in some kind of database like set of structures.
When your computer comes to life with Microsoft Windows and various programs doing various things, what is going on from the informational point of view, is similar to the concept of what is going on in a dynamic soul. When you buy a CD-ROM that contains various programs and data that you can use with your computer, from an informational point of view that CD is similar to the concept of part of a static soul.
The dynamic soul is the consequence of a set of computer like programs that are running in the brain-body; the dynamic soul is in control of the body in the same general way that a computer might be in control of a robot. If one could extract a copy of a soul from its brain-body, it would make no sense without also knowing the detailed structure and logic of brain-bodies in general and of its particular brain-body. Similarly, if one is given a binary copy of a machine code computer program, it cannot be understood without also understanding the exact nature of the machine and operating systems that are capable of running that code. It is quite possible (but perhaps extraordinarily difficult) that the most likely design and structure of the machine or computer capable of running the code could be deciphered from a study and analysis of the code.
When a program is running in a computer, it makes use of the hardware and operating systems of the computer in order to run properly. The running of a program is the evolution of the program and its data in time. While it is running, we may think of the program as being in a dynamic state. If we pause the computer, so that the program comes to an instantaneous stop, ready to continue at the press of a key, we would still say that the program is in a dynamic state. In actual fact, a dynamic program running a billion instructions per second could be said to be at a dead stop a billion times each second.
A program is in the static state when it has been rendered inoperable by being translated and copied onto some medium, such as onto a floppy disk that is stored for future use. At some time in the future, the program can be reinserted into the computer and caused to continue from the exact point where it had stopped. It also can be brought to life in a different computer so long as the different computer is sufficiently compatible with the original one. Thus the difference between static and dynamic is only a matter of degree. It is no more than, in this case, the difference between being able to take the next step in a few pico-seconds, or in a few hours or a few millennia.
A single picture frame from a motion picture film is a static representation of a movie at one instant in time. It’s as though the world in the movie was brought to a stop. To understand the meaning of a snapshot in relation to a movie, we need to know the position of the snapshot within the sequences of snapshots in the movie. Such a snapshot is a lot like the state of a program and its data stored on a floppy. However, the program on the floppy is complete while the snapshot is only a partial 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional real world. Of course the program on the floppy can only come back to life if it is loaded into a compatible computer.
If we could capture some of what there is to a human soul, at one moment in time, we would have a snapshot of part of a soul. Of course, a real snapshot leaves a lot out. It is two-dimensional and deals only with what is visible to the camera. Looking at a single snapshot, we can’t necessarily tell how things were changing. On the other hand, our definition of a static soul is that we capture, at one point in time, everything about that soul, including all of the information needed to make it dynamic.
The most common example of a natural static soul is a seed. It has all of the informational aspects of the plant that it can grow into. While static, a seed can remain viable for decades. Then, when put into an appropriate nurturing environment, it can start to grow into whatever it is destined to be. A seed is similar to a floppy disk that has a software virus on it. It is static until it is placed in a nurturing environment, i.e. moist, fertile earth for the seed, a computer for the computer virus.
Assume that we want to solve a very hard mathematical problem. Factoring a very large integer (hundreds of digits) is such a problem that can be broken down into parts. One hypothetical way to do this would be to create a computer virus which contains the number to be factored, and some factoring software. The algorithm could involve a probabilistic search. Once in the computer, the program could make copies of itself and spread the virus. The descendents of the original virus are very unlikely to search the same space as any of their ancestors as there are simple processes that allow a program to come up with a random number. The likelihood that any descendant will come up with a random number that is the same as some other descendant’s can be made arbitrarily small. Eventually, one of the descendants of the original virus might solve the problem. In this example, the every copy of virus has a Soul. It is the informational aspects that allow it to operate, reproduce and fulfill its destiny. Similarly a carrot seed has a soul. It is the informational aspects that allow it to germinate, grow and differentiate into a mature carrot, and reproduce its kind by producing carrot seeds. Obviously, in the 2 examples above, the computer virus reproduces asexually while the carrot reproduces sexually. I’m sure that, in the near future, we will see much improved computer viruses that reproduce sexually and that can evolve as do living things.
To be specific, we believe that a static soul can be represented by information. We will use a simple mathematical notation; a superscript, i, to indicate an individual person and a subscript, t, to indicate a point in time. The static soul is just that information that defines the static soul of person, i , at time t. can be conveniently divided into three parts:
, The information that describes the accessible, external world.
, The information that defines how that brain-body processes Q.
, The information that is retained in and processed by that brain-body
The boundaries between W, P and Q are not precise.
It may be useful to compare these parts of a soul with corresponding parts of a computer system. W is like the environment that a computer is in. This includes connections to external networks such as the Internet. The computer might have video or audio input devices which enlarge W. P is like the computer hardware along with the operating system and various applications programs. Q is like my files in the computer. Things I have typed in or modified. Q includes pictures I may have downloaded from the Web, my correspondences, the state of games I am playing, etc. The function F is the computational engine, the hardware that actually produces the new state, time=t 1, from the old state, time=t.
When a program sets a parameter in the operating system, is that parameter part of the operating system or part of the program? One can think of it either way. With some exceptions, it is easy to see what should be in each of the three categories, W, P and Q. Occasionally, the preferred category may be decided somewhat arbitrarily. The breakdown of the informational constructs of a soul into the three classes, W, P and Q is a useful exercise, aiding one in developing a sensible model of the informational aspects of a soul.
The evolution of P (the acquisition of skills and useful know how) proceeds relatively faster in a child than in an adult. On the other hand, the evolution of Q (the application of skills and know how) can proceed relatively faster in adults.
Given two people, i and j, and have a lot in common. Just as everyone is normally born with 2 eyes, 2 ears, general bilateral symmetry with a few exceptions, much of the abode of the soul is similar from one person to another. However, one person may be an Olympic Gold Medallist at the 100 Meter dash, while another person may be a couch potato. From one person to another, and are as similar and as different as is the body of one person compared to another. If i and j are of the same age and sex and general physical condition, and would have more in common. If i and j are a pair of identical twins, and would have even more in common though there would still be differences.
What we call “brain-body” most others would simply call the brain. However, we consider it important to realize that thinking involves more than just the brain. The brain is only part of the nervous system. Our eyes are intimately connected to the visual cortex. We often have thoughts that cause a visceral reaction that is in turn communicated back to the brain. Whenever we think, we are in an environment; our body – our world. We almost never imagine the possibility of being in some really foreign kind of world. The possibilities as to what could be different are vast: a world could have a different spatial geometry and connectedness; it might not have the hierarchical structure (biology, chemistry, molecules, atoms, particles) of our physics.
Thus, the normal abode of the soul is not just the brain, not just what we are calling the “brain-body”, but also the combination of the brain-body and the environment. P is not the brain-body, but rather it is a precise informational model of how the brain-body-world processes information. P has two major components: generic and specific. The generic component involves that which is in common with our world (e.g. the laws of physics) and with essentially all other normal humans. In the computer analogy, the generic component is similar to the idea of a particular computer and operating system, such as in the Mac, or in a PC running Windows; it would include software packages such as MS Office. The specific information has to do with all the things that differentiate this person from other persons. This includes genetic differences along with the memories of a lifetime, the characteristics of personality, etc. In the computer analogy, the specific component is similar to what parameters and data are in the computer and how various files such as autoexec.bat, config.sys, win.ini, the Registry etc., are setup. Of course it also includes all files peculiar to that machine such as documents written by the user, records of email exchanges, digitized photos from the user’s camera, etc.
What this means is that P is the definition of a particular, complex interpreter (in the computer sense). In a computer, we may write a program in Java, or one of thousands of other computer languages or application development systems. An engine is needed to interpret what we write in order for a computer to carry out the actions that the programmer had in mind. The engine is either a kind of program called an interpreter, or it is the computer hardware. “Execution” is a good name for the action of the computer hardware directly executing the steps of a program. Sometimes, interpretation is preceded by compilation. This is a step where the program, written in a language optimized for the human process of writing the program, is translated into a language more suitable for execution on a particular computer. Additionally, all of the other software that will be needed during program execution must also be available in any host computer that hopes to run the program correctly. A compiler needs to know two things: first, the actions that are supposed to result as a consequence of what the programmer wrote, and second, how to get a particular computer to carry out those actions.
A start towards understanding information processes had to await the computer age. But just because the computer age is upon us does not mean we already have a full understanding as to what information is. What is true is that we now merely have a better understanding of what an information process is. Information processes are unusual from the point of view of physics. They don’t have the need of conventional kinds of physical dimensions. For example, a person can be described as having a certain amount of mass, normally measured as weight. A person has a nominal length, thought of as his or her height. A person can be described as a system that converts a certain amount of chemical energy into mechanical work and heat, normally thought of as having a rate of metabolism and often measured in calories/day.
From the point of view of physics, what we call our weight really is what we think of as our mass; it has dimensions M and is measured in Kilograms or perhaps in pounds. Height has dimension L and is measured in Meters or feet and inches. Time has dimension T and is measured in seconds. Energy has dimensions ML2/T2 and is measured in Joules, kilowatt-hours or Calories. Information processes, on the other hand, are not described by any of the current units or physical dimensions so far as we know. This means that 2 bits of information that interact in a logic element of a computer cannot now be understood in terms of amounts of Mass, Length or Time or any particular combination of such units. This is likely just a reflection of our current ignorance. Someday we may discover a unit of information that is closely related to some combination of units such as ML2/T, which happens to be angular momentum. In physics, the unit of angular momentum is called Ñ (Planck’s Constant Reduced). The 2 most fundamental constants of physics are the speed of light, c, and Ñ. What seems likely today, is that those 2 constants are involved in the most basic kinds of computer operations.
Of course such physical things as printed-paper, magnetic disks, brains or DNA can represent information. Information must ultimately have a physical means of its representation, however the information itself is independent of the means of its representation.
The ages old concept of a clear distinction between the physical parts of the body and the evanescent part, the human soul, turns out to be correct. The fact that the soul can be resident in a physical brain-body does not mean that the soul is physical in the physics sense of Mass, Length and Time. The soul is physical only in the sense that information is part of the world of physics. But physics has not yet finished putting “information” into the proper pigeonhole. Information is certainly subject to the laws of physics, but it is not physical in the sense that a machine is physical. A machine can be explained in its entirety as interacting components, each of which is covered by the units of Mass, Length and Time. For a machine, the choice of materials is important; you cannot make an anvil out of warm butter. Information has to do with the arrangement of things and the processes that result in the rearrangement of things. It is totally independent of what the things are made of. This point must not be obscured by the fact that, today, books are best printed with ink on paper and integrated circuits are best made out of silicon plus carefully chosen impurities. In principle, what is used to represent information is irrelevant to the information. Those who long ago thought to describe the soul as immaterial made a wise and prescient choice.
ПРАВИ САМУРАЈИ !!! МИ СМО СРПСКИ СМУРАЈИ ПОБЕДИЋЕМО ЗЛО, ЧАСТ, ЗНАЊЕ И ПОШТЕЊЕ, ЖИВОТ БЕЗ ЧАСТИ НЕМА СМИСЛА!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9HR7TTOReE
АКО СУ ОНИ ТОЛИКО ГЛУПИ КОЛИКО СМО ТЕК МИ!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0efLWdJWk4&feature=related
INTEKLEKT???http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu8b9c8__D8&feature=&p=97103E1185A620B4&index=0&playnext=1
ОВО ЈЕ СРПСКИ БРАНД ,А САДА ???????http://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbs=vid:1&&sa=X&psj=1&ei=Fh5DTdXMOIqa8QOnid0l&ved=0CC8QBSgA&q=TESLA%27S+GENIUS&spell=1&fp=867e4e474b188c89
Dodato posle 7 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ДАЛИ СМО МИ СРБИ ГЛУПИ??? ИЛИ СМО ПРЕВИШЕ ДИВНИ И ФИНИ??? ДОЗВОЛИЛИ СМО ДА НАМА УПРАВЉАЈУ НАКАЗЕ!!! http://www.google.com/#q=PARALLEL+UNIVERSES+TESLA&hl=en&sa=X&prmd=ivns&source=univ&tbs=vid:1&tbo=u&psj=1&ei=hh9DTdSbGsrusgaovL2rDg&oi=video_result_group&ct=title&resnum=5&ved=0CEkQqwQwBA&fp=dded8f20a6bb9442
Dodato posle 7 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ОВО СРПСКИ, ЗАОСТАКЛИ, СВЕТ МОРА ДА ВИДИ!!!http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&tbs=vid:1&q=NIKOLA+TESLA&aq=f&aqi=p-p1g9&aql=&oq=&psj=1&fp=867e4e474b188c89
ДЕБИЛИ НАМ НАПЛАЋУЈУ СТРУЈУ!!! А ЈА ПРОГРАМИРАМ ДУШУ БЕПЛАТНО!!!
Dodato posle 3 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
А МАЈМУНИ ТРАЖЕ НОВАЦ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKWPht3fU-o&feature=related
Dodato posle 7 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
!!Интелект побеђује!http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/09/china-economic-international-leader
Dodato posle 4 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ДАЛИ СМО РОБОТИ???http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/roboticexplorers/robots_like_people.html
БЕЗБОЛНО УНИШТАВАЊЕ СВЕТА!!! http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=08c_1243348599
РОБОТИ!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGxdgNJ_lZM
Dodato posle 10 Sati 15 minuta:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ИСТИНАttp://www.chrismaser.com/truth.htm
anasonicWillEmphasize3D,IPTVin2011.html
